How do your non-executive board roles bring value to your daily work at Interface?
There are two key aspects. First, observing how other companies face challenges and applying those experiences to my work. Do we encounter similar risks? Are we addressing them the same way? For example, at Tauw, the engineering consultancy firm, their focus on the built environment, water management and drone measurements provides insights into future trends and the capabilities of an engineering firm. It’s also interesting to see a different business model - operating as a consultant rather than a producer.
In my other board role at Reesink, primarily a dealership for agricultural machinery, highlights how market changes, like climate change, impact the sector and potentially Interface. For example, understanding agricultural developments is key with bio-based backing, and these insights help me address relevant topics at Interface.
The second aspect is gaining a different perspective. As a supervisory board member, you observe leadership from a distance, focusing on strategy, risks and team dynamics. I value how building the right teams strengthens a company. While strong products and processes matter, collaboration and enhancing team strengths are key to growth.
I gained this understanding from turning around family-run and private equity businesses from near bankruptcy. While this approach worked for smaller companies, as a supervisory board member, it becomes even clearer that success is all about having the right people in the right roles. I see this in other companies too - things may run smoothly for a while, but sometimes a change in leadership is needed, and it’s often easier to recognize that from the board than from within the leadership team.
You've been praised for your sharp mind, humor and perseverance. How do these traits influence your decision to join a supervisory board?
In a vice president role, humor may not be essential but offers advantages. A sharp mind is vital for focusing energy, asking vital questions and assessing success. Humor fosters connections, facilitating important discussions about your role. The Dutch, like the British, have a dark sense of humor, and combining this with humility is effective in addressing tough topics.
Tackling difficult issues is inevitable, as tough decisions often require "soft skills," which I find challenging to master. It's crucial to identify individuals who can take on leadership roles and have the responsibility, time, energy, and perseverance to see a project through. In change management, restructuring, and layoffs, perseverance is needed from both me and those implementing the changes.
I’ve seen remarkable transformations in companies within one or two years, with struggling businesses becoming high-performing. Recently at Interface, we restructured regional leadership, increasing the Great Place to Work survey driving response rates to 90%. This indicates strong employee engagement and participation. Although this area faced significant challenges and a strike two years ago, new leadership has fostered clear understanding and well-defined goals. This turnaround required perseverance from the leaders and tough decisions on my part.
When deciding to join a board, I must ensure I bring relevance to the role. If a company needs a razor-sharp financial perspective, they should seek someone with a private equity or M&A background. My strengths lie in change management and people skills, including experience with works councils, which I find particularly engaging. The company must align with sustainability values can not conflict with my role at Interface. A lack of a strong connection with the chair would also be a dealbreaker, as I believe a solid relationship with the chair and CEO is crucial.